Provincial Distance in a Tar Nation

Producing the world’s dirtiest oil requires the world’s biggest trucks, the largest toxic waste pits in human history, and more water than any other industrial project in history.

This video is a refresher and a reminder – the oil companies have to fight back so hard because they are peddling some of the worst stuff on earth.

Let’s not give an inch to this disaster.

Take a look at this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84zIj_EdQdM

Peace,

Ron Rink

 

Why the Elites Are in Trouble

(This is another article by Chris Hedges — and it’s also about the Occupy Wall Street protest, but it does such a great job of portraying how our good protesters are managing, I felt I had to post it here.)

Published on Monday, October 10, 2011 by TruthDig.com

Why the Elites Are in Trouble
by Chris Hedges

Ketchup, a petite 22-year-old from Chicago with wavy red hair and glasses with bright red frames, arrived in Zuccotti Park in New York on Sept. 17. She had a tent, a rolling suitcase, 40 dollars’ worth of food, the graphic version of Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” and a sleeping bag. She had no return ticket, no idea what she was undertaking, and no acquaintances among the stragglers who joined her that afternoon to begin the Wall Street occupation. She decided to go to New York after reading the Canadian magazine Adbusters, which called for the occupation, although she noted that when she got to the park Adbusters had no discernable presence.

The lords of finance in the looming towers surrounding the park, who toy with money and lives, who make the political class, the press and the judiciary jump at their demands, who destroy the ecosystem for profit and drain the U.S. Treasury to gamble and speculate, took little notice of Ketchup or any of the other scruffy activists on the street below them. The elites consider everyone outside their sphere marginal or invisible. And what significance could an artist who paid her bills by working as a waitress have for the powerful? What could she and the others in Zuccotti Park do to them? What threat can the weak pose to the strong? Those who worship money believe their buckets of cash, like the $4.6 million JPMorgan Chase gave a few days ago to the New York City Police Foundation, can buy them perpetual power and security. Masters all, kneeling before the idols of the marketplace, blinded by their self-importance, impervious to human suffering, bloated from unchecked greed and privilege, they were about to be taught a lesson in the folly of hubris.

Even now, three weeks later, elites, and their mouthpieces in the press, continue to puzzle over what people like Ketchup want. Where is the list of demands? Why don’t they present us with specific goals? Why can’t they articulate an agenda?

The goal to people like Ketchup is very, very clear. It can be articulated in one word—REBELLION. These protesters have not come to work within the system. They are not pleading with Congress for electoral reform. They know electoral politics is a farce and have found another way to be heard and exercise power. They have no faith, nor should they, in the political system or the two major political parties. They know the press will not amplify their voices, and so they created a press of their own. They know the economy serves the oligarchs, so they formed their own communal system. This movement is an effort to take our country back.

This is a goal the power elite cannot comprehend. They cannot envision a day when they will not be in charge of our lives. The elites believe, and seek to make us believe, that globalization and unfettered capitalism are natural law, some kind of permanent and eternal dynamic that can never be altered. What the elites fail to realize is that rebellion will not stop until the corporate state is extinguished. It will not stop until there is an end to the corporate abuse of the poor, the working class, the elderly, the sick, children, those being slaughtered in our imperial wars and tortured in our black sites. It will not stop until foreclosures and bank repossessions stop. It will not stop until students no longer have to go into debt to be educated, and families no longer have to plunge into bankruptcy to pay medical bills. It will not stop until the corporate destruction of the ecosystem stops, and our relationships with each other and the planet are radically reconfigured. And that is why the elites, and the rotted and degenerate system of corporate power they sustain, are in trouble. That is why they keep asking what the demands are. They don’t understand what is happening. They are deaf, dumb and blind.

“The world can’t continue on its current path and survive,” Ketchup told me. “That idea is selfish and blind. It’s not sustainable. People all over the globe are suffering needlessly at our hands.”

The occupation of Wall Street has formed an alternative community that defies the profit-driven hierarchical structures of corporate capitalism. If the police shut down the encampment in New York tonight, the power elite will still lose, for this vision and structure have been imprinted into the thousands of people who have passed through park, renamed Liberty Plaza by the protesters. The greatest gift the occupation has given us is a blueprint for how to fight back. And this blueprint is being transferred to cities and parks across the country.

“We get to the park,” Ketchup says of the first day. “There’s madness for a little while. There were a lot of people. They were using megaphones at first. Nobody could hear. Then someone says we should get into circles and talk about what needed to happen, what we thought we could accomplish. And so that’s what we did. There was a note-taker in each circle. I don’t know what happened with those notes, probably nothing, but it was a good start. One person at a time, airing your ideas. There was one person saying that he wasn’t very hopeful about what we could accomplish here, that he wasn’t very optimistic. And then my response was that, well, we have to be optimistic, because if anybody’s going to get anything done, it’s going be us here. People said different things about what our priorities should be. People were talking about the one-demand idea. Someone called for AIG executives to be prosecuted. There was someone who had come from Spain to be there, saying that she was here to help us avoid the mistakes that were made in Spain. It was a wide spectrum. Some had come because of their own personal suffering or what they saw in the world.”

“After the circles broke I felt disheartened because it was sort of chaotic,” she said. “I didn’t have anybody there, so it was a little depressing. I didn’t know what was going to happen.”

“Over the past few months, people had been meeting in New York City general assembly,” she said. “One of them is named Brooke. She’s a professor of social ecology. She did my facilitation training. There’s her and a lot of other people, students, school teachers, different people who were involved with that … so they organized a general assembly.”

“It’s funny that the cops won’t let us use megaphones, because it’s to make our lives harder, but we actually end up making a much louder sound [with the “people’s mic”] and I imagine it’s much more annoying to the people around us,” she said. “I had been in the back, unable to hear. I walked to different parts of the circle. I saw this man talking in short phrases and people were repeating them. I don’t know whose idea it was, but that started on the first night. The first general assembly was a little chaotic because people had no idea … a general assembly, what is this for? At first it was kind of grandstanding about what were our demands. Ending corporate personhood is one that has come up again and again as a favorite and. … What ended up happening was, they said, OK, we’re going to break into work groups.

“People were worried we were going to get kicked out of the park at 10 p.m. This was a major concern. There were tons of cops. I’ve heard that it’s costing the city a ton of money to have constant surveillance on a bunch of peaceful protesters who aren’t hurting anyone. With the people’s mic, everything we do is completely transparent. We know there are undercover cops in the crowd. I think I was talking to one last night, but it’s like, what are you trying to accomplish? We don’t have any secrets.”

“The undercover cops are the only ones who ask, ‘Who’s the leader?’ ” she said. “Presumably, if they know who our leaders are they can take them out. The fact is we have no leader. There’s no leader, so there’s nothing they can do.

“There was a woman [in the medics unit]. This guy was pretending to be a reporter. The first question he asks is, ‘Who’s the leader?’ She goes, ‘I’m the leader.’ And he says, ‘Oh yeah, what are you in charge of?’ She says, ‘I’m in a charge of everything.’ He says, ‘Oh yeah? What’s your title?’ She says ‘God.’ ”

“So it’s 9:30 p.m. and people are worried that they’re going to try and rush us out of the camp,” she said, referring back to the first day. “At 9:30 they break into work groups. I joined the group on contingency plans. The job of the bedding group was to find cardboard for people to sleep on. The contingency group had to decide what to do if they kick us out. The big decision we made was to announce to the group that if we were dispersed we were going to meet back at 10 a.m. the next day in the park. Another group was arts and culture. What was really cool was that we assumed we were going to be there more than one night. There was a food group. They were going dumpster diving. The direct action committee plans for direct, visible action like marches. There was a security team. It’s security against the cops. The cops are the only people we think that might hurt us. The security team keeps people awake in shifts. They always have people awake.”

The work groups make logistical decisions, and the general assembly makes large policy decisions.

“Work groups make their own decisions,” Ketchup said. “For example, someone donated a laptop. And because I’ve been taking minutes I keep running around and asking, ‘Does someone have a laptop I could borrow?’ The media team, upon receiving that laptop, designated it to me for my use on behalf of the Internet committee. The computer isn’t mine. When I go back to Chicago, I’m not going to take it. Right now I don’t even know where it is. Someone else is using it. But so, after hearing this, people thought it had been gifted to me personally. People were upset by that. So a member of the Internet work group went in front of the group and said, ‘This is a need of the committee. It’s been put into Ketchup’s care.’ They explained that to the group, but didn’t ask for consensus on it, because the committees are empowered. Some people might still think that choice was inappropriate. In the future, it might be handled differently.”

Working groups blossomed in the following days. The media working group was joined by a welcome working group for new arrivals, a sanitation working group (some members of which go around the park on skateboards as they carry brooms), a legal working group with lawyers, an events working group, an education working group, medics, a facilitation working group (which trains new facilitators for the general assembly meetings), a public relations working group, and an outreach working group for like-minded communities as well as the general public. There is an Internet working group and an open source technology working group. The nearby McDonald’s is the principal bathroom for the park after Burger King banned protesters from its facilities.

Caucuses also grew up in the encampment, including a “Speak Easy caucus.” “That’s a caucus I started,” Ketchup said. “It is for a broad spectrum of individuals from female-bodied people who identify as women to male-bodied people who are not traditionally masculine. That’s called the ‘Speak Easy’ caucus. I was just talking to a woman named Sharon who’s interested in starting a caucus for people of color.

“A caucus gives people a safe space to talk to each other without people from the culture of their oppressors present. It gives them greater power together, so that if the larger group is taking an action that the caucus felt was specifically against their interests, then the caucus can block that action. Consensus can potentially still be reached after a caucus blocks something, but a block, or a ‘paramount objection,’ is really serious. You’re saying that you are willing to walk out.”

“We’ve done a couple of things so far,” she said. “So, you know the live stream? The comments are moderated on the live stream. There are moderators who remove racist comments, comments that say ‘I hate cops’ or ‘Kill cops.’ They remove irrelevant comments that have nothing to do with the movement. There is this woman who is incredibly hardworking and intelligent. She has been the driving force of the finance committee. Her hair is half-blond and half-black. People were referring to her as “blond-black hottie.” These comments weren’t moderated, and at one point whoever was running the camera took the camera off her face and did a body scan. So, that was one of the first things the caucus talked about. We decided as a caucus that I would go to the moderators and tell them this is a serious problem. If you’re moderating other offensive comments then you need to moderate these kinds of offensive comments.”

The heart of the protest is the two daily meetings, held in the morning and the evening. The assemblies, which usually last about two hours, start with a review of process, which is open to change and improvement, so people are clear about how the assembly works. Those who would like to speak raise their hand and get on “stack.”

“There’s a stack keeper,” Ketchup said. “The stack keeper writes down your name or some signifier for you. A lot of white men are the people raising their hands. So, anyone who is not apparently a white man gets to jump stack. The stack keeper will make note of the fact that the person who put their hand up was not a white man and will arrange the list so that it’s not dominated by white men. People don’t get called up in the same order as they raise their hand.”

While someone is speaking, their words amplified by the people’s mic, the crowd responds through hand signals.

“Putting your fingers up like this,” she said, holding her hands up and wiggling her fingers, “means you like what you’re hearing, or you’re in agreement. Like this,” she said, holding her hands level and wiggling her fingers, “means you don’t like it so much. Fingers down, you don’t like it at all; you’re not in agreement. Then there’s this triangle you make with your hand that says ‘point of process.’ So, if you think that something is not being respected within the process that we’ve agreed to follow then you can bring that up.”

“You wait till you’re called,” she said. “These rules get abused all the time, but they are important. We start with agenda items, which are proposals or group discussions. Then working group report-backs, so you know what every working group is doing. Then we have general announcements. The agenda items have been brought to the facilitators by the working groups because you need the whole group to pay attention. Like last night, Legal brought up a discussion on bail: ‘Can we agree that the money from the general funds can be allotted if someone needs bail?’ And the group had to come to consensus on that. [It decided yes.] There’s two co-facilitators, a stack keeper, a timekeeper, a vibes-person making sure that people are feeling OK, that people’s voices aren’t getting stomped on, and then if someone’s being really disruptive, the vibes-person deals with them. There’s a note-taker—I end up doing that a lot because I type very, very quickly. We try to keep the facilitation team one man, one woman, or one female-bodied person, one male-bodied person. When you facilitate multiple times it’s rough on your brain. You end up having a lot of criticism thrown your way. You need to keep the facilitators rotating as much as possible. It needs to be a huge, huge priority to have a strong facilitation group.”

“People have been yelled out of the park,” she said. “Someone had a sign the other day that said ‘Kill the Jew Bankers.’ They got screamed out of the park. Someone else had a sign with the N-word on it. That person’s sign was ripped up, but that person is apparently still in the park.

“We’re trying to make this a space that everyone can join. This is something the caucuses are trying to really work on. We are having workshops to get people to understand their privilege.”

But perhaps the most important rule adopted by the protesters is nonviolence and nonaggression against the police, no matter how brutal the police become.

“The cops, I think, maced those women in the face and expected the men and women around them to start a riot,” Ketchup said. “They want a riot. They can deal with a riot. They cannot deal with nonviolent protesters with cameras.”

I tell Ketchup I will bring her my winter sleeping bag. It is getting cold. She will need it. I leave her in a light drizzle and walk down Broadway. I pass the barricades, uniformed officers on motorcycles, the rows of paddy wagons and lines of patrol cars that block the streets into the financial district and surround the park. These bankers, I think, have no idea what they are up against.

Copyright © 2011 Truthdig, L.L.C.
Chris Hedges writes a regular column for Truthdig.com. Hedges graduated from Harvard Divinity School and was for nearly two decades a foreign correspondent for The New York Times. He is the author of many books, including: War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, What Every Person Should Know About War, and American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. His most recent book is Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.

Article printed from www.CommonDreams.org
Source URL: https://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/10/10-1

24 Hours of Reality

Hello …

Would you travel to a remote village in Pakistan to give a presentation about climate change? That’s just part of the daily routine for Asif Iqbal, one of the outstanding people who will be giving presentations around the world during 24 Hours of Reality.

Beginning on September 14, Asif will take part in our 24-hour event that will bring the world together to address reality. He’ll be one of a diverse group of Climate Presenters who will tell the truth about climate change in multiple languages, in an event live streamed around the world.

Asif has lived an extraordinary life. He grew up in Pakistan in a remote, mountainous region, and has been passionate about environmental protection from an early age. Through his work at World Vision Pakistan, he helps share the truth about climate change and motivate others to take action. In 2009, he was trained as a Climate Presenter by our Chairman, former Vice President Al Gore.

Asif told us he feels a “moral responsibility to do whatever I can, even a little thing, to protect the beauty of my homeland, to educate people, to reach influencers and to motivate others for action.”

You can learn more about Asif and our other Climate Presenters when you view our Climate Reality Blog. Browse through interviews with our Presenters to read about where they are from and why they’re taking part in 24 Hours of Reality.

You’ll find stories about people like Nitin Raikar, who helped protect the environment while serving in the Indian Army. Or Rachel Brown, who leads a network of businesses committed to sustainable development in New Zealand.

I hope you’ll be joining us for 24 Hours of Reality beginning on September 14. Until then, learn more about the people who will make that day a special event. Read about our Climate Presenters on the Climate Reality Blog.

http://climaterealityproject.org/blog/

Thanks,

Ron Rink

New Pipeline to Challenge Obama’s Promises

I saw this a few moments ago. This is written by my friend and former neighbor, Bill McKibben, the founder of 350.org. Sure hope there are many, many people who will head to Washington D.C. to take part in the 2-week demonstration. More info about this is in the article.

Peace,

Ron Rink
======================================================

New pipeline to challenge Obama’s promises

Obama finally has the opportunity to make good on his environmental promises, but will he?

Bill McKibben Last Modified: 04 Aug 2011 13:15

Keystone Pipeline

Potential 1,500 mile pipeline could be ‘essentially game over’ for the climate

It took some serious digging in the sock drawer, but eventually I found my ‘Environmentalists for Obama‘ button left over from the ’08 campaign. I needed it because I’m headed to Washington in a couple of weeks to get arrested in front of the White House, and I wanted to make sure I wouldn’t be misunderstood.

I’m not alone – as many as a thousand people will risk arrest in daily protests at the White House over the last two weeks of August, making it the largest outbreak of civil disobedience in recent environmental history.

The target: a proposed 2,400 km pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico. Those tar sands are the largest pool of carbon on the continent; the federal government’s pre-eminent climate scientist, James Hansen, said recently that if we begin burning it in large quantities, it’s “essentially game over” for the climate.

The politics

So in scientific terms it’s a no-brainer (in fact, earlier this week more than a dozen of the nation’s most senior climate scientists weighed in against the proposed pipeline). But in political terms? That’s harder, because there’s serious money at stake. Since the first permit must come from the State Department, for instance, it’s probably no wonder that the pipeline consortium hired Hilary Clinton’s former deputy campaign director as its chief lobbyist. And indeed, even before any data was collected, the secretary of state said she was ‘inclined’ to grant the permit.

There’s real worry that the fix is in, especially since recently released WikiLeaks documents show American officials working with the tar sands companies to develop a strategy to ‘spin’ reporters and win favourable press coverage.

Still – the ultimate decision will rest with President Obama. Hence the sit-ins. And the buttons.

Because when you get right down to it, Obama has been a great enigma on the greatest crisis we’ve ever faced: the rapidly escalating heating of the planet.

On the one hand, his first stimulus package set aside some money for green investment (though a much smaller percentage than, say, China). And he’s worked to persuade the auto companies he bailed out to raise mileage levels for their cars in the future.

But this is the guy who – the night he won the presidential nomination – said that with his ascension “the rise of the oceans would begin to slow, and the planet begin to heal”. By that standard, he’s not even close.

Not keeping promises

Earlier this year he opened up a vast swath of Wyoming to new coal mining. And he barely offered even lip service in support of the climate bill that foundered in the Senate; in the words of the widely-respected climate blogger Joe Romm, “Obama’s overall record on energy and the environment deserves an F. Fundamentally, he let die our best chance to preserve a liveable climate and restore US leadership in clean energy – without a serious fight.”

Of course, Obama can say with some justification that his weak record on the environment results in part from having to work with a Congress so dominated by the fossil fuel industry that it voted earlier this year to deny the very existence of global warming. Which is why this pipeline question is so politically key: this time, Obama gets to make the decision all by himself. He doesn’t have to answer to Oklahoma Senator Inhofe (“global warming is a hoax”) or Rep. Michelle Bachmann (“It’s all voodoo, nonsense, hokum”)

Because the pipeline crosses our border, he needs to sign a finding that it’s in the national interest – and if he doesn’t, then the Tea Party can’t force him. The right wing has made it clear it wants the pipeline built, but unlike the recent debt ceiling negotiations, it has no leverage. It’s all on Obama this time.

Which is why we’ll be outside his house this August. Because we want to believe in the words of that skinny senator from Illinois during his campaign; because we want to show him the depth of the support he can call on if he stands up just this once to the fossil fuel industry. I’ll wear my button with pride – and a little trepidation too.

Bill McKibben is one of the founders of tarsandsaction.org , which is organizing this month’s civil disobedience.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.
Source: Al Jazeera

Your Help Needed …

Today I have a couple of things I’d like to bring into your focus.

The first pertains to an article I read a couple of days ago which was raising the question as to whether the Climate Change issue could be leading to a Security Problem. Do we need a Peace-Keeping Force in the United Nations to deal with places in the world who are making the problem worse? Below is a link to a video which looks at this issue.

The video has some interesting looks at how a Climate Change disaster in one area of the world can leap-frog into several other areas – often surprisingly. I’m also pleased to see some discussion of how the subject of methane being 20-times more powerful than carbon in terms of Climate Change was included.

Check it out: http://www.commondreams.org/video/2011/07/23

===================================================

Another topic which needs our attention. This isn’t strictly Climate Change but it sure has an effect on our environment which , as you’ll read below, certainly will affect it.

If you care about the water you drink, the air you breathe, and America’s natural heritage, we need you to contact your members of Congress today. Here’s a link which I hope will take you to a page where you can make that contact. This is the mother of all anti-environment bills.

https://secure2.edf.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=1863

The U.S. House is poised to vote this week on the must-pass House Interior Appropriations Bill, which contains more than 40 amendments and “policy riders.”

Taken together, these provisions represent the single worst attack on public health and the environment in American history. Here’s the link again:

https://secure2.edf.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=1863

I know – you’ve seen a gazillion of these online links for petitions and letters – and I also know they’re rarely noticed directly by the politicos – but I did learn that they often do have someone on their staff count them. Whether that’s worth anything – who knows – but it is better than doing nothing!

I already know how my Congresspeople here in my district of Ohio will vote – my Representative to the House is party-line all the way (and not my party) and my Senators are a wash – one will – one won’t.

While we are not likely to win the vote in the House, the vote margin will make a huge difference when the fight moves to the Senate. We need to make sure every member of Congress understands the gravity of this vote, and that the American people are watching.

Devastating Assault

Instead of moving stand-alone legislation or openly debating the merits of gutting America’s environmental protections, the House is trying to sneak more than 40 anti-environment amendments and policy riders into the Interior Appropriations bill.

And that’s even before it comes to the floor, where many members of Congress have already announced plans to amend the bill and make it even worse.

There are too many dangerous provisions to go into details on each, but some of the most outrageous that have already been added include:

  • Blocking EPA from regulating deadly pollution like mercury, smog, and soot from power plants and cement plants. The pollution that these facilities would then be allowed to spew could cause up to 27,800 premature deaths.

  • Opening up lands immediately next to the Grand Canyon to uranium mining, despoiling one of the most iconic landscapes in the United States, and potentially contaminating its waters with radioactivity.

  • Stripping Clean Water Act protections for the drinking water sources of 117 million Americans.

  • Driving endangered plants and animals to extinction, by preventing federal agencies from listing any species as endangered or protecting their critical habitats.

These four provisions alone would represent a historic assault on our environmental heritage and human health protections. There are dozens of others just like them in this monstrous bill.

A vote could come any day.

https://secure2.edf.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=1863

=========================================

Finally for today ….

As you know this Keystone XL Pipeline scares the crap out of me. I wrote about it at length in the last post. Well, now I’m going to ask you to make a phone call to your House Representative.

Big Oil’s allies in Congress have introduced a bill which will expedite the Keystone XL project! The Keystone XL project will double the amount of tar sands oil consumed in the United States.

As it transports the world’s dirtiest oil from the tar sands pits of Alberta to the heavily-polluting refineries in Texas, the pipeline will also threaten our drinking water with toxic spills. Its sister pipeline – the Keystone One – has already ruptured 12 times in it’s first year of operation.

Barrel for barrel, the production of tar sands oil spews three-times more Climate Change pollution than producing conventional oil. To add insult to injury, it will actually raise gas prices in most areas.

The Obama Administration needs MORE time – not less – to conduct a more thorough environmental review of the pipeline. Of course, Big Oil wants to make sure that review never happens.

The House could vote on H.R. 1938 in the next few days so your Representative needs to hear from you.

You can use this URL to find the phone number for your Representative.

http://www.house.gov/representatives

That’s it for this time.

Be well — Be in peace,

Ron Rink


Keystone XL Pipeline

One of the things I’m devoting time to is the proposed new pipeline coming out of Alberta Canada to carry the tar sands oil products down to the Texas oil fields. It’s called the Keystone XL.

Around this time last year, there was a big oil spill in Kalamazoo, Michigan. The oil disaster gushed nearly 1 million gallons of tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River watershed from a broken pipeline. The company involved in this spill was the Enbridge Oil company.

On July 19, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revealed the findings from its spring river assessment in Kalamazoo. The impacted waterways are in much worse shape than anyone had thought due to tar sands oil sinking into the riverbed. The EPA has identified over 200 acres of submerged toxic tar sands oil that has spread, unseen, throughout 40 miles of waterway.

Before any pipeline project gains approval, like the Keystone XL, we need to fully understand what happened with Enbridge tar sands pipeline, line 6B, and the dozens of other pipeline spills that have happened in the last year. Congress needs to focus on increased pipeline safety to ensure that our communities, natural resources and wildlife will never face another oil spill disaster like the one in the Kalamazoo River.

The Keystone XL pipeline is a monster. It will be a 36-inch diameter pipeline carrying nine times the volume of the Silvertip line which just vomited a 1,000 barrels of crude into the Yellowstone River. Keystone will be crossing some of the most isolated places in the high plains, cutting through the ecologically fragile Nebraska Sandhills and the irreplaceable Ogallala aquifer

Keystone XL won’t carry “light, sweet” crude, which floats on top of water and can be mopped up with absorbent booms. Bitumen—a tar-like substance mined from the Alberta tar sands, chemically diluted, and heated to improve flow—will travel at high pressure across Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas to Gulf Coast refineries. If and when it leaks into water bodies, this product will sink. To judge the risk of that happening, it helps to know that the first piece of the Keystone system, TransCanada’s Keystone I pipeline that crosses the eastern Dakotas, has sprung a dozen leaks in its first year of operation.

Here are some of the alarming conclusions based on two deeply researched reports based on a series of Freedom of Information Act requests about the safety and emergency response planing for Keystone I.

    • Federal regulations for crude oil pipeline response plans are much weaker than regulations for other potential polluters, such as oil tankers and oil refineries;
    • In calculating its worst-case spill scenarios, TransCanada (who owns the Keystone XL pipeline) does not consider the possible impacts of operator error during use of its complex pipeline control systems, and therefore underestimates worst-case spill amounts;
    • For on-water spills, TransCanada underestimates needed shoreline cleanup equipment capacity by 50 percent;
    • Equipment allocated for potential spills in North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska is completely inadequate to the scale of spill risk;
    • Designated responders lack capacity to move adequate amounts of equipment to major rivers put at risk by the Keystone Pipeline System fast enough to protect them. Such rivers include the Missouri River at both the Fort Peck Dam and at Yankton, S.D., the Yellowstone River at Miles City, Mont., the Niobrara and Platte Rivers in Nebraska, and more;
    • In much of the northern Great Plains, local businesses do not have the ability to shelter and feed thousands of workers at short notice, with the result that TransCanada and its contractors would be responsible not only for responding to an oil spill, but for caring for the needs of thousands of spill responders far from large commercial supply networks. Should a spill happen during harsh winter conditions, these logistical problems could turn into a nightmare.

The Yellowstone River spill, 1-20th the size of last year’s Enbridge pipeline spill on the Kalamazoo River in Michigan, has attracted hundreds of spill-response workers to the Billings area. Fortunately, Billings is the largest city in Montana, and far enough from the booming oil, gas, and coal fields to the south and east to have significant available lodging. Many areas along the Keystone I and Keystone XL routes would be incapable of providing for a large spill response workforce without major, time-consuming shifts in infrastructure. There is no indication that TransCanada has plans in place for this kind of logistical effort.

The people of the Northern Great Plains take their land seriously. When they speak about the potential tar-sands pipeline they use phrases like, “They’re siting it across from me.” It’s not “across their land” – its “across from me”, because out on the harsh, beautiful plains that so many take for granted, people identify with their land like they identify with their own bodies. Most Americans have no experience with this level of connectedness.

What about the people who live up in Alberta where all the tar-sands oil is being mined. Here a two 30 minute videos where you can hear what they have to say first hand. These videos visually relay the terribleness of this project.

Witness to the Last Drop — Part One:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDDb1iTw6pQ

Witness to the Last Drop — Part Two 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrWZzBOCoc

Please reach out to our Congressional leaders and demand that we protect communities, wildlife and our natural resources before rushing dangerous tar sands pipeline projects, like the Keystone XL. We know the President and the Secretary of State are pondering a decision about this. There’s no time to waste.

Before I sign off for today, I want to be sure to let you know about a protest that will take place in Washington, D.C. this summer. Bill McKibben, co-founder of 350.org and several others including, author and farmer Wendell Berry, actor Danny Glover and NASA climate scientist James Hansen. Here’s a link to an article which tells all about it:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/27/idUS323166223820110627

Be well – be in peace,

Ron Rink