When Will We Get It?

 

Alberta Oil Sands Project

Alberta Oil Sands Project

When Will We Get It?

How many times do we have to be warned before we get the message? For more than 25 years scientists have been warning us about the dangers we are creating for our climate. This is a distinct danger, not only to us as human beings, but to all forms of life on our planet.

We’re not “getting it” because we aren’t seeing enough evidence yet. Sure, we see all the severe weather that is happening around the globe, but that only affects a few thousand people. Most of us are unscathed by these storms. We feel for those who are affected – we send them money or other forms of aid, but then we go right back to our usual ways of living, hoping the next storm doesn’t affect us.

Some researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the California Institute of Technology looked at how Earth’s plant life is likely to react over the next 20 or 30 years in response to our ways of life which are producing greenhouse gases. These scientists are predicting that wherever Earth is not covered by ice or desert, the plants will undergo major changes as some species will overrun other species to the extent that better than 30% of our plant cover will change in some way. These changes will be so drastic that humans and animals will have to figure out ways to adapt to the changes or relocate — if they can find a place to go. One question we should be asking is how much adaptation can we manage? Are there limits?

On top of the changing plant communities, their studies predict that the ecological balance between interdependent and often endangered plants and animals will be so altered that it will affect our biodiversity and further create havoc with our water, energy, carbon and other vital elements. These elements won’t be able to follow the cycles they’ve always been on. Ever think about what it would be like to try to live without as much water as we have available right now? Or how about our energy sources?

I say, “Think about it?”

Our greed and disregard for the future has caused us to have activities in our agricultural practices and our urbanization so that we are destroying our natural habitats – not only for humans, but also for plants and animals. When we change the climate on Earth, the plants and animals have to migrate to other places in order to survive. However, with the changes happening so rapidly now, we’ve begun to effectively block the successful process of migration. The plants and animals are running low on their adaptability – at least they aren’t able to adapt fast enough to keep up with our rate of destruction.

Again, this is something which isn’t so obvious that it has received our undivided attention, so when we read about another species becoming endangered or no longer existing, we don’t get too bothered by it.

The latest scientific reports coming out of the United Nations indicate we will have a warmer and wetter Earth, with global temperatures increasing 2 to 4 degrees Celsius by 2100. This is the same warming that occurred almost 20,000 years ago,during the Last Glacial Maximum — except this time it’s happening about 100 times faster. These changes will cause some areas of Earth to become much wetter than usual, while others will become much drier. I feel we got a glimpse of that over this past year.

These reports predict that during this century the most affected areas for dramatic change will be in the Northern Hemisphere high altitudes particularly along the northern and southern boundaries of the boreal forests.

But then , those amazing boreal forests in Canada are being demolished to satisfy our greed and grasping for oil which is being developing out of the tar sands there. They have to destroy the boreal forest to get at the tar sands. (See the photo above — that used to be boreal forest!!)

Of course, our even greedier politicians are pulling every trick in the book to get those tar sands sent via pipe lines to Texas. Look at how they tacked the pipeline approval on top of the bill to renew the Payroll Tax Cut.

When will we ever get it?

Peace,

Ron Rink

Author-Activist Bill McKibben Gets “Disobedient” About Climate Change

This article appeared in Seven Days, a leading Vermont newspaper. Since it’s about my friend and former neighbor, Bill McKibben, I would like to share it with all of you.

Peace,

Ron Rink
=================================================

Published on Seven Days (http://www.7dvt.com)

Author-Activist Bill McKibben Gets “Disobedient” About Climate Change

Local Matters

By Kevin J. Kelley [08.10.11]

Not too many Distinguished Scholars at Middlebury College get arrested at the White House gates. But that’s what Bill McKibben, who’s also a Harvard grad, intends to do August 20 at the start of a two-week series of civil-disobedience actions that could lead to scores of Vermonters being carted away by the D.C. police.

McKibben is helping to organize this protest against a proposed $7 billion, 1700-mile pipeline that would pump crude oil to Texas refineries from tar sands in Alberta, Canada. As one of more than 1000 activists who have pledged to break the law, McKibben says he feels compelled to make a radical move because the effects of climate change are becoming so grave. NASA scientist James Hansen recently warned that tapping Canada’s vast oil sands would stoke the atmosphere’s carbon overload to the point where “it’s game over” for planet Earth.

Nearly a year ago, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton went on record saying she’s “inclined” to let the oil flow. Given the Obama administration’s mixed record on environmental issues, McKibben isn’t convinced the president will have a different view. A decision is expected within the next three months.

“The insane flooding we saw this spring in Vermont,” McKibben remarks, is a symptom of the one-degree rise in average global temperature that’s already been brought about by burning oil and coal. Most climate scientists agree that Earth is going to warm by at least another degree even if the output of greenhouse gases is radically reduced. An increase of an additional two or three degrees, which could occur as a result of projects such as the Alberta-Texas pipeline, will render the next century “completely impossible,” as opposed to “merely miserable,” McKibben says.

Despite their sense of urgency, organizers want to make sure the White House arrests take the form of what McKibben calls “very civil disobedience.” Decorum should be maintained, he suggests with a smile, because “it’s too hot to be fighting” in the streets of Washington in August. The goal is “to demonstrate who the real radicals are — the ones who are willing to alter the Earth’s atmosphere,” McKibben continues, his smile receding. “We’re a conservative force by comparison.”

Middlebury College doesn’t appear to object if its brightest faculty star winds up getting busted in Pennsylvania Avenue’s no-go zone — and the incident airs on CNN. In fact, it sounds officially supportive. “Protests have long been a part of the political discourse in American democracy,” says Alison Byerly, the college’s provost. “Middlebury faculty and staff are private citizens as well as employees of the college and pursue a wide range of interests and passions, many of which enrich their interactions with our students.”

McKibben in turn applauds the school that recruited him soon after he relocated to Ripton from the Adirondacks in 2001. “Middlebury had started moving toward having a green campus before I got there,” he notes. The college’s commitment to achieving carbon-neutrality “meant students didn’t have to badger the administration, which freed them to do much more important things,” says the scholar-in-residence in environmental studies.

In the decade he’s been at Middlebury, McKibben has taught two courses. But in 2007, he helped Midd kids launch a movement called Step It Up that instigated climate demonstrations across the United States. Step It Up also spawned 350.org [1], the catalyzing agent for today’s global campaign to prevent atmospheric carbon content from reaching catastrophic levels.

All this has flowed from The End of Nature, McKibben’s prophetic book about global warming. Published in 1989, the best seller changed the thinking — and the lives — of some of its readers, among them Vermont actress Kathryn Blume. “That was where my awareness began,” she says by way of explaining why she also plans to get arrested at the White House. Blume says she’ll use the book as the basis for her next one-woman play — her second about becoming an activist.

McKibben’s charisma, scholarship and relentless roadwork have proved inspirational far beyond Vermont. Offsetting whatever frustration he may feel, McKibben says, is the satisfaction he’s gained from collaborating with activists “in the poorest parts of the world,” including — to name a few he’s recently visited — India, China, the Maldives, Mexico, Lebanon, Ethiopia, Bangladesh and Oman.

Rock-star status notwithstanding, hop-scotching the globe does get wearying, confesses McKibben, 50, over a lunch-time plate of chicken curry at Taste of India restaurant on Bakery Lane in Middlebury. Balding and almost gaunt, he laments, “There have been stretches where I’ve been home only 50 or 60 days a year. I’ve hated that because I do love it here.”

When he travels, McKibben usually leaves behind his wife, author Sue Halpern, who is also a Middlebury College scholar-in-residence, and their teenage daughter, Sophie. He says he misses them both, along with Vermont’s political culture and natural beauty, adding that he’s proud to live in a place recognized in China and other countries as a world leader in environmental awareness.

Does the state deserve its green reputation? Shutting down Vermont Yankee, according to McKibben, was “the easiest case there ever was to make.” Noting it took a “30-foot wall of water” to damage the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, McKibben recalls that the side of a cooling tower at Yankee “just fell off” a few years ago. Entergy, the owner of the Vernon plant, “shouldn’t be allowed to run even a chain of convenience stores,” McKibben charges.

The trend in energy generation, he observes, is “away from few and big and toward many and small.” He’s all for wind power, for example, despite the opposition of some Vermont greens to ridgeline installations. “Every kind of energy has drawbacks,” McKibben acknowledges. “In general, the benefit of the doubt belongs to renewable energy.”

He says he’d welcome wind turbines in his own backyard — or at least up the road at the Middlebury Snow Bowl. “There’s something to be said for dealing with the drawbacks closer to where the energy is being consumed,” McKibben suggests. Right now, though, he notes, the drawbacks of fossil-fuel power plants are felt most acutely in places like West Virginia, where mountains are being blown apart to expose their coal deposits, and low-lying, densely populated Bangladesh, which is starting to sink like Atlantis as the ice caps melt.

In McKibben’s view, the “planetary emergency,” as Al Gore calls it, still doesn’t justify partnering with a company such as Lockheed Martin on climate-control initiatives, as Burlington Mayor Bob Kiss has proposed. “There’s enough local talent to do what needs to be done” in Burlington, McKibben maintains. He goes easy on Kiss, though, insisting the mayor’s willingness to work with a warplanes manufacturer doesn’t make him “a warmonger.”

Lockheed’s expertise can supplement the talent that Burlington does possess, Kiss says in response. But the politically beleaguered mayor doesn’t sound eager to battle a segment of the Progressive base for the sake of salvaging the Lockheed deal. The company was “looking at this relationship as a way to build a positive effort,” Kiss says. “They don’t want to add to controversy.” So, while conversations between the city and Lockheed are continuing, “there’s no timetable” for taking action, the mayor reports.

Local actions of any sort could be negated by what’s happening on the planetary level, McKibben warns: Think locally, act globally, in other words. “We could replicate Hardwick and the Intervale all across Vermont,” he says, “but if it rains every day for 30 days, or if it never rains, you won’t be able to grow any food.”

That’s what keeps Joe Solomon, a 350.org staffer, in the fight. Referring to the likely impact of the Alberta-Texas pipeline, Solomon notes that “all that extra carbon is what burns up Vermont’s summers, melts away our ski seasons, unravels our farms and will keep breaking unprecedented floods upon us. We have a hell of a lot of self-interest to stop this thing.”

The current political and economic situation could not be less conducive to McKibben’s mission. But waiting for things to improve is not an option, either. “This isn’t a problem like other problems,” McKibben warns. “We can’t come back to it in 10 years when the politics may be better.”

What’s more, “there’s no guarantee we’re going to win,” McKibben points out. In that crucial respect, the climate movement differs from one of its activist antecedents. “People in the civil-rights movement had to be braver because they could be shot at,” McKibben reflects, “but they had the great advantage of knowing they were going to win.”

Source URL: http://www.7dvt.com/2011author-activist-bill-mckibben-gets-disobedient-about-climate-change
Links:
[1] http://350.org

More on the Tar Sands Oil Pipeline!

Things just got interesting.

A few months ago, we launched a campaign to expose the truth about the U.S. Chamber of Commerce: that it’s just a front-group for corporate polluters, blocking climate action at every turn.

Then, last week, we teamed up with our allies to launch an entirely different campaign to stop the new Keystone XL pipeline–a dangerous project that would pump a million barrels of dirty tar sands oil from Canada every day.

Now, these two campaigns are coming together: the U.S. Chamber of Commerce just announced the “Partnership to Fuel America,” which they claim will promote energy policy that will keep America “clean.” The first major initiative of this partnerhship is a campaign to promote the Keystone XL pipeline–one of the dirtiest projects on the entire planet. Seems ridiculous? That’s because it is.

This polluter partnership is just a scheme to let dirty energy companies distort the truth. Their game-plan is to deceive the country through an “AstroTurf” campaign (AKA fake grassroots) that will try to green-wash tar sands oil and pass it off as clean energy.

We can’t let them get away with such a baldly corrupt plan. The Keystone XL pipeline will threaten communities, pour a catastrophic amount of carbon into the atmosphere, and keep us hooked on fossil fuel when we should be transitioning to renewable energy.

Keystone XL is the fuse to the biggest carbon bomb on the planet, and we’re going to do everything we possibly can to snuff it out.

Here’s our 3-part plan to fight back:

1) We’re petitioning President Obama to reject the permit for the pipeline. Already, nearly 30,000 people have signed on–but we’ll need many more to make a big impact for our high-profile petition delivery in DC. Please sign on (and pass it along!) today: www.350.org/take-a-stand

2) We’re spreading the word about a civil disobedience campaign being planned in DC this August. If you’re ready to escalate your committment to this movement–or know someone who is–please check out www.TarSandsAction.org

3) We’re planning hard-hitting activism in all the states that the Keystone pipeline passes through. We’ll be dominating public comment hearings to oppose the pipeline, recruiting local chambers of commerce to take a stand to stop the tar sands, and on September 24th we’ll be coordinating big rallies for the Moving Planet day of action to make sure that our elected officials know just where their constituents stand.

We know it’s been a tough year: the weather’s getting weirder, the political situation is getting grimmer, and it’s sometimes hard to see just how we’ll get out of this mess.

But know this: the world needs you now more than it ever has before, and this movement is capable of amazing things when we work together.